An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Renewable Energy Sources

Authors

Abstract

Decision-making in energy planning can be approached as a problem of multicriteria decision analysis in which different types of factors are involved. This task must take into account several aspects due to the increasing complexity of social, technological and economic factors. In this context, this paper uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize a set of criteria, subcriteria and alternatives as a support for decision-making in the process of energy planning with renewable energies for rural areas in the Caribbean region of Colombia. Based on the participation of experts, 5 criteria, 20 subcriteria and 4 alternatives were defined. Using the AHP, the same group of experts was consulted in order to prioritize all aspects. The results showed that the most relevant criteria were the technical with 24.7%. Next were environmental (21.7%), social (19.6%), economic (17.8%) and risk (16.3%). The best renewable energy alternative was solar with 45.3%.Keywords: Renewable Energy, Energy Planning, Analytic Hierarchy ProcessJEL Classifications: Q20, Q42, D70 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carlos Arturo Robles Algarin, Universidad del Magdalena

Facultad de Ingeniería

Aura Polo Llanos, Universidad del Magdalena

Facultad de Ingeniería

Adalberto Ospino Castro, Universidad de la Costa

Facultad de Ingeniería

Downloads

Published

2017-09-30

How to Cite

Robles Algarin, C. A., Polo Llanos, A., & Ospino Castro, A. (2017). An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Renewable Energy Sources. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4), 38–47. Retrieved from https://econjournals.com./index.php/ijeep/article/view/5154

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously , that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.