Volatility Asymmetry of Scale Indexes - Taking China as an Example

Authors

  • Shih-Yung Wei Yulin Normal University
  • Jao-Hong Cheng Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics Dongfang Colleg
  • Li-Wei Lin Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics Dongfang Colleg
  • Su-Mei Gan

Abstract

This study focused on the volatility asymmetry of scale indexes in China's stock market. A total of 12 indexes in four categories were studied during the study period, which lasted from January 1, 2012 to September 30, 2018. The study results showed that large-scale volatility asymmetry almost never occurred but small-scale volatility asymmetry was very significant, which could result from the status of information reception in China. It was easier for large companies to receive information than small companies; therefore, compared with small companies, information asymmetry rarely happened to large companies, leading to the situation where small companies were more likely to have fiercer negative responses to information. However, this study did not divide the study period into bull markets and bear markets, and the addition and subtraction of these two periods could dilute the causes of the disappearance of large-scale volatility asymmetry.Keywords: Volatility asymmetry; Scale indexes; EGARCHJEL Classification: G2DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.8200

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Shih-Yung Wei, Yulin Normal University

Business School

Jao-Hong Cheng, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics Dongfang Colleg

Information School

Li-Wei Lin, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics Dongfang Colleg

Information School

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-07-11

How to Cite

Wei, S.-Y., Cheng, J.-H., Lin, L.-W., & Gan, S.-M. (2020). Volatility Asymmetry of Scale Indexes - Taking China as an Example. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 10(4), 158–169. Retrieved from https://econjournals.com./index.php/ijefi/article/view/8200

Issue

Section

Articles
Views
  • Abstract 250
  • PDF 319
  • Untitled 0